Psychology of humans

The nature of people

What is the trait of people?    

Mainstream American culture is optimistic to that extent as it is

assumed that any accomplishment is executable if worked for, and that humanity is ultimately perfectible - as the millions of individual-facilitate books and videos marketed every year show (Schein, 1981).

However this premise of perfectibility does not entail that the American is as hopeful about his/her reverse prospects in regular encounters.

The realism that the discussion social unit regularly includes legal body implies care that the other party will renege on an agreement if given ambiguity.

Many Europeans expend a more bearish approach towards human traits. They show a greater distrust of experts, and take for granted that human motives are more interwoven than do Americans. This is reverberated in a predilection for more convoluted cognitive models of activity and hence more composite constitution than are established in American social groups (Cooper and Cox, 1989).

Relationship to nature

What is the person's relationship to nature?

Up until newly, U.S.A. culture has generally perceived the human as set-apart from nature, and entitled to tap it. Such activities as mining, blocking rivers for hydro-electrical power, studying and preparation to control weather condition activities, genic technology, altogether present a need for authority.

Still of late, the public has turned more aware of needs to preserve the environs, and this is mirrored in corporate selling policies and the evolution of 'recyclable' and 'biodegradable' productss.

More in general, representations of authority are reflected in a preparedness to manage the psychology of humans, and human relationships. An exemplar is provided by policy intended to adapt an organizational culture.

In comparison, Arab culture tends to be extremely fatalistic towards attempts to change or ameliorate the world. Humankind can do little itself to achieve success or avert catastrophe.